I started playing the game a while ago, and over time I began noticing that wars are heavily focused on power, financial support, and alliances. A lot revolves around a single battle — dividing military and economic power, and manipulating the game’s mechanics in ways that allow dominance and victory to stand out. Very little attention is given to what the weaker side can actually do, and very little is discussed about strategies beyond the battles themselves and beyond the limits of the game’s rules.
The element of surprise plays a major role, such as launching fake wars in different locations to scatter and distract damage squads. For example, if in a single battle one ally is dealing 6 million damage while an enemy is dealing 8 million, then attacking that enemy forces their 8 million to effectively match the 6 million — because the enemy is the one under pressure to win, while the ally is not.
And I’m not saying the ally with equal damage must be the one attacking directly — game rules or positioning may not allow that. But it can still be done through another ally, or even through an unexpected battle that happens by chance.
There are also fake battles — attacking multiple enemies through multiple allies to conceal the real target. Or targeting the weaker allies of enemies to create internal pressure and problems within their ranks. Alternatively, striking strong opponents with heavy force can cause confusion and disagreements about who should receive support.
What I’m trying to highlight here are strategies that are rarely used, often misunderstood, or sometimes applied in the wrong way. I encourage everyone to break away from routine gameplay and start exploring new, creative approaches that can make the game more strategic, more dynamic, and more enjoyable.